October 31st, 2007 No comments

Kingsley and Darwin. From Wikipedia, I learn that Charles Kingsley, a well-known Victorian evangelical pastor, was an enthusiast for Darwin’s theory of evolution— at at least in Darwin’s first book. The Origin of Species. (Click here to read more.)

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

October 30th, 2007 No comments

Hard Hat Area. (click to enlarge)

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

October 28th, 2007 1 comment

Price Discrimination Terminology. Last week at the I.O. workshop someone had a good idea for replacing the old 1st, 2nd, 3rd degree price discrimination terminology. Exogenous-feature price discrimination is based on things the buyer can’t change that the seller observes, such as his age. Endogenous-feature price discrimination is based on things the buyer can change, such as the quantity he buys or the quality he buys.

Categories: Economics, game theory Tags:

October 28th, 2007 No comments

The Uses of Suffering. Not all suffering can be explained as useful, but some can, as Paul does in Romans 5:3-5: (Click here to read more.)

Categories: Bible, religion Tags:

October 25th, 2007 No comments

HTML-Expanding Thumbnail Images. Highslide is javascript for putting a thumbnail image to show up in your HMTL page and for another, larger, file, to appear if it’s clicked upon. (Click here to read more.)

Categories: HTML, software, weblogs, writing Tags:

October 24th, 2007 No comments

Longevity. Ian Ayres, author of Supercrunchers (which sounds good though I’ve only read the first chapter as yet) told me of Northwestern Mutual’s "The Longevity Game" website, which lets you estimate how long you will live. If I remember rightly, I came out to live to 87.

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

October 23rd, 2007 No comments

Jimmy Carter. David Frum lists a couple of sleazy things about Jimmy Carter. I ought to link to a cite that collects items about the old pharisee, but this will do for now. (Click here to read more.)

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

October 22nd, 2007 No comments

Colorful Blurs From Christchurch’s hall.

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

October 21st, 2007 No comments

Playing at Christianity. The Baylyblog has this excellent quote from Kierkegaard. I really should read more of him.

We all know what it is to play warfare in mock battle, that it means to imitate everything just as it is in war. The troops are drawn up, they march into the field, seriousness is evident in every eye, but also courage and enthusiasm, the orderlies rush back and forth intrepidly, the commander’s voice is heard, the signals, the battle cry, the volley of musketry, the thunder of cannon—everything exactly as it is in war, lacking only one thing…the danger.

So also it is with playing Christianity, that is, imitating Christian preaching in such a way that everything, absolutely everything is included in as deceptive a form as possible—only one thing is lacking…the danger. (Kierkegaard, Attack upon Christendom)

This should link to my post on Alistair McGrath. A theologian should put himself on the line, rather than just describing what other people believe.

An economist, too?

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

October 20th, 2007 No comments

Written Pornograph: A Recent Case. Via Baylyblog, the New York Times, we learn that the Clinton Administration quit doing obscenity prosecutions. Bush has resumed, but only now has brought one for anything other than images. What the liberals courts will do with it is uncertain. (Click here to read more.)

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

October 19th, 2007 No comments

Writing Numerical Examples. I was just reading Frank Buckley’s Just Exchange (what a nice title!) and he gave a numerical example using $105 and $100. That is how I would do it too. But my eye started skipping past the numbers. I wonder if it would be better to use words, and to adjust the numbers. Should he have used fifteen dollars and fourteen dolalrs instead? I’m not sure.

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

October 18th, 2007 No comments

A Grand Stone Head. From inside Dore Abbey in Herefordshire. Click the image to enlarge it.

Categories: art, travel Tags:

October 17th, 2007 No comments

Antitrust Thoughts. It’s the mark of a good journal article that it stimulates thought. On the strong recommendation of JV, I started reading Professor William Kovacic’s "THE INTELLECTUAL DNA OF MODERN U.S. COMPETITION LAW FOR DOMINANT FIRM CONDUCT: THE CHICAGO/HARVARD DOUBLE HELIX," Columbia Business Law Review, 2007. He argues that modern antitrust law should not be viewed as Chicago School plus Post-Chicago School, but as Chicago School economics plus Harvard Law pragmatism. Areeda, Turner, and Breyer had a big impact in the way they thought about how judges can actually implement antitrust law. (Click here to read more.)

Categories: law, surplus. social regulation Tags:

October 17th, 2007 No comments

Negative Reviews and Inframarginal Subsidies for Investment. MR emailed me recently asking me to look at part of a review by RM of his recent book. As you can see, the review says the book’s theory is “remarkable”, quotes at length including a diagram, and then implies that the theory is wrong, without saying why. (Click here to read more.)

Categories: finance, Japan, price theory, reviews, writing Tags:

October 16th, 2007 No comments

A Model of Probabilistic Rules for Project Acceptance. This is inspired by a recent working paper by Vickers and Armstrong. Project i has payoff (Ui,Vi) to agent and principal and is feasible with probability theta_i. Both players must agree to implement a project; otherwise they get (0,0). They can agree to one project at most. Only the agent observes which projects are available. He can keep silent or he can truthfully reveal the (U,V) of a project, but he cannot lie. (Click here to read more.)

Categories: Economics, i.o., organization Tags:

October 15th, 2007 No comments

Global Warming. This picture is from NASA. It shows nicely that global warming shows up as only small summer changes, with the action coming in winter-spring temperatures in the Arctic centered in Yukon and Siberia. I also came across NASA’s page on how they got the 2000-2006 data wrong, with their explanation that the mistakes in their secret method weren’t really important. True, but their credibility is gone now, and if they got the USA temperatures wrong in the direction they favor, how about the much harder to measure temperatures elsewhere in the world?

Categories: global warming Tags:

October 15th, 2007 1 comment

Global Warming: Ice Caps and the Argument from Authority. Why
should we trust a PhD in climate science when he talks about ice caps
any more than we trust a D.Phil. in theology when he talks about God?
Both are experts, but both entered their vocations because they had
policy views on their subjects. (Click here to read more.)

Categories: global warming Tags:

October 14th, 2007 No comments

Alistair McGrath. David Wegener writes this about Alistair McGrath’s theologizing.(Click here to read more.)

Partial Identification and Chi-Squared Tests

October 13th, 2007 No comments

I heard Adam Rosen give his paper, “Confidence sets for partially identified parameters that satisfy a finite number of moment inequalities.” It stimulated some thoughts. (Click here to read

Categories: math, statistics Tags:

King Offa’s Border Policy

October 12th, 2007 1 comment

I was reading about the border policies of King Offa, the Anglo-Saxon king of Mercia. He made no attempt to conquer Wales. Instead, he built Offa’s Dyke, a boundary-marking ridge, and every few years he raided Wales. (Click here to read


October 11th, 2007 No comments

What do you get if you castrate a man, feed him estrogen, and stuff him into a dress?

—A fat, castrated, man in a dress.

Categories: philosophy, social regulation Tags:

An Umbrella with a Drip Case

October 10th, 2007 No comments

I brought this umbrella back from Taipei. It has a case to prevent dripping from the wet umbrella onto the floor when it is folded up. The case opens automatically when you open the umbrella, telescoping down into a little cap on top of the umbrella.

Categories: statistics Tags:

A Coin Flip Example for Intelligent Design

October 10th, 2007 No comments

1. Suppose we come across a hundred bags of 20-chip draws from
hundred different urns. Each bag contains 20 red chips. We naturally
deduce that the urns contain only red chips. (Click here to read more.)

Clicking to Expand Concealed Text in HTML

October 9th, 2007 4 comments

Arvind Satyanarayan’s “Toggle Visibility – Show/Hide Anything” is worth knowing about. (Click here to read more.)

Categories: blogging, HTML, javascript Tags:

Case Control Studies and Repeated Sampling

October 8th, 2007 No comments

A standard counterintuitive result in statistics is that if the
true model is logit, then it is okay to use a sample selected on the
Y’s, which is what the “case-control method” amounts to. You may select
1000 observations with Y=1 and 1000 observations with Y=0 and do
estimation of the effects of every variable but the constant in the
usual way, without any sort of weighting. This was shown in Prentice &
Pyke (1979). They also purport to show that the standard errors may be
computed in the usual way— that is, using the curvature (2nd
derivative) of the likelihood function. (Click here for more)

Evolution and Religion

October 6th, 2007 No comments

David Sloan Wilson, author of Darwin’s Cathedral, a book about the usefulness of religion as an evolutionary adaption, harshly criticizes Richard Dawkins for sloppiness in thinking about religion and evolution. This is part of Dawkins’s contempt for group selection, which is misguided. Click here to read more

Election Fraud and Fired US Attorney John McKay

October 5th, 2007 No comments

I have read people saying that election fraud has trivial importance in the United States, so the Republicans’ desire for investigations and for identity to be verified for voting is unjustified. Here’s clear evidence against that. Note, too, the behavior of US Attorney John McKay, who was later fired.Click here to read more

Wooden Forks

October 4th, 2007 No comments

Kew Gardens had these nice wooden implements at the cafe near the Victoria Gate. Aren’t they better than plastic?

Categories: ideas, inventions Tags:

Is Not Necessarily Equal To

October 4th, 2007 4 comments

At lunch at Nuffield I was just asking MM about some math notation I’d like: a symbol for “is not necessarily equal to”. For example, and economics paper might show the following:

Proposition: Stocks with equal risks might or might not have the same returns. In the model’s notation, x IS NOT NECESSARILY EQUAL TO y.

Click here to read more

Categories: math, notation, statistics, writing Tags:

How Does Christianity Affect My Life

October 3rd, 2007 1 comment

A good question to ask oneself is: “How do I live my life differently because of my religious beliefs?” Or, put a little differently: “If I didn’t believe X, how would my life change?”

Personally, I don’t think I’d engage in much vice, since gross sin is not advisable even if one’s aim is temporal happiness. I guess I’d not be writing posts like this if I were not Christian, nor would I go to church, or teach my children about God, or find interest in reading the Bible or thinking about theology. I wouldn’t pray, I suppose, though there is an earthly case to be made for prayer too. I would not give money to charity, and I would spend a lot more of my income— that is perhaps the biggest behavioral change I would expect.

Categories: life, religion Tags:

Bayesian vs. Frequentist Statistical Theory: George and Susan

October 2nd, 2007 1 comment

Susan either likes George or dislikes him. His prior belief is that there is a 50% chance that she likes him. He also believes that if she does, there is an 80% chance she will smile at him, and if she does not, there is a 60% chance. She smiles at him. What should he think of that?

The Frequentist approach says that George should choose the answer which has the greatest likelihood given the data, and so he should believe that she likes him.Click here to read more

Categories: frequentist, statistics, thinking Tags:

Civil Suits for Shoplifting

October 1st, 2007 1 comment

This sign at Sainsbury’s grocery store says (you might have to enlarge it to get a clear view) that they not only criminally prosecute shoplifters, but use a more fearsome tactic: the civil suit. They’ll go after the thief for their losses *and* their expenses in dealing with him.

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:


September 30th, 2007 No comments

I’ve started reading the just-published book, God’s Undertaker: Has Science Buried God?, of John Lennox, whom I met at St. Ebbe’s. It’s good. I think I see the essence of the philosophical position of Naturalism now,Click here to read more

Shoulder Muscles and Handwriting

September 29th, 2007 No comments

"Tips for improving your handwriting," by Dyas A. Lawson sounds worth trying.Click here to read more

Categories: beauty, handwriting, writing Tags:

Weighted Least Squares and Why More Data is Better

September 28th, 2007 No comments

<p>In doing statistics, when should we weight different observations differently?<p>

Suppose I have 10 independent observations of $x$ and I want to estimate the population mean, $\mu$. Why should I use the unweighted sample mean rather than weighting the first observation .91 and each of the rest by .01?<p>

Either way, I get an unbiased estimate, but the unweighted mean gives me lower variance of the estimator. If I use just observation 1 (a weight of 100% on it) then my estimator has the variance of the disturbance. If I use two observations, then a big positive disturbance on observation 1 might be cancelled out by a big negative on observation 2. Indeed, the worst case is that observation 2 also has a big positive disturbance, in which case I am no worse off by having it. I do not want to overweight any one observation, because I want mistakes to cancel out as evenly as possible.<p>

All this is completely free of the distribution of the disturbance term. It doesn't rely on the Central Limit Theorem, which says that as $n$ increases then the distribution of the estimator approaches the normal distribution (if I don't use too much weighting, at least!).<p>

If I knew that observation 1 had a smaller disturbance on average, then I *would* want to weight it more heavily. That's heteroskedasticity. <p>

Categories: statistics Tags:

Lizzie’s Plus Table

September 27th, 2007 No comments

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

Who Most Wants To Be Elected Policeman?

September 26th, 2007 No comments

Jerusalem Post via National Review


Two weeks after Israel’s alleged bombing raid in Syria, which some foreign reports said targeted North Korean nuclear material, the UN’s nuclear watchdog elected Syria as deputy chairman of its General Conference on Monday.

Read more…

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:


September 25th, 2007 No comments

Page 96 of David Cox’s 2006 Principles of Statistical
Inference has a very nice one-sentence summary of asymptotic theory:

[A]pproximations are derived on the basis that the amount of
information is large, errors of estimation are small, nonlinear
relations are locally linear and a central limit effect operates to
induce approximate normality of log likelihood derivatives.

Categories: statistics Tags:

Bayesian vs. Frequentist Statistical Theory

September 25th, 2007 No comments

The Frequentist view of probability is that a coin with a 50% probability of heads will turn up heads 50% of the time.

The Bayesian view of probability is that a coin with a 50% probabilit of heads is one on which a knowledgeable risk-neutral observer would put a bet at even odds.

The Bayesian view is better.

When it comes to statistics, the essence of the Frequentist view is to ask whether the number of heads that shows up in one or more trials is probable given the null hypothesis that the true odds in any one toss are 50%.

When it comes to statistics, the essence of the Bayesian view is to estimate, given the number of number of heads that shows up in one or more trials and the observer’s prior belief about the odds, the probability that the odds are 50% versus the odds being some alternative number.

I like the frequentist view better. It’s neater not to have a prior involved.

Categories: statistics Tags: